Risk Management & Insurance Review
Volume 5 Issue 2 Page 77 - September 2002
To cite this article: Richard A. Derrig, Valerie Zicko (2002)
Prosecuting Insurance Fraud—A Case Study of the Massachusetts Experience in the 1990s
Risk Management & Insurance Review 5 (2), 77–104.
doi:10.1111/1098-1616.00016
Welcome to Blackwell Synergy - the source of highly cited peer-reviewed society journals from Blackwell Publishing
You are attempting to access the full-text of this article. To access this content you, or your library, will need to have an online subscription to the journal. Alternatively you can purchase immediate access to the article using a credit card.
- If you already have an online subscription please login at the top of this page.
- To purchase an online subscription to this journal please visit the journal homepage and click on 'Subscribe'.
- To purchase immediate access to this article for 30 days through our secure web site using a credit card, please click the 'Full Text Article' or 'PDF' button below, and follow the instructions.
Invited Article
Prosecuting Insurance Fraud—A Case Study of the Massachusetts Experience in the 1990s
Abstract
There is widespread agreement that insurance fraud is a major problem in the United States. There is little agreement, however, in what constitutes insurance fraud in the many articles and research papers published on the subject during the past ten years. The term ''fraud'' carries the connotation that the activity is illegal and, hence, that prosecution and conviction are potential outcomes of a specific fraud. Accepting that premise allows us to adopt the legal definition of fraud in the insurance context and to examine the experience of dealing with insurance fraud in terms of property-liability insurance lines. Specifically, we examine ten years of data on referrals and disposals of incidents of suspected fraud as processed by the Insurance Fraud Bureau of Massachusetts to provide estimates of the distribution of types of people who perpetrate a variety of insurance frauds. We compile conviction rates, sentencing outcomes, and recidivism rates in detail to illuminate the law enforcement process and to gauge the deterrent effect of prosecuting insurance fraud in the criminal courts. The Massachusetts data lead us to conclude that the number of cases of convictable fraud is much smaller than the prevailing view of the extent of fraud; that the majority of guilty subjects have prior (noninsurance) criminal records; and that sentencing of subjects guilty of insurance fraud appears effective as both a general and specific deterrent for insurance fraud but ineffective as a specific deterrent for other crime types, as the recidivism rate appears no different from the general property criminal's recidivism rate.
This article is cited by:
- Jörg Schiller. (2006) The Impact of Insurance Fraud Detection Systems. Journal of Risk & Insurance 73:3, 421–438
No comments:
Post a Comment